top of page

ESTHER Atkins possessed an air of theatricality in her dissolute occupation, distinguished by her

flamboyant attire. At times, she draped herself in an opera cloak, while on other occasions, she adorned her silk blouse with broad ribbon sashes that cascaded from her waist to the hem of her skirt.


During the depths of winter, she mirrored the wintry conditions, presenting herself in pristine white, setting her apart from her fallen companions in her outward cleanliness.


Yet, a prostitute she remained, not exempt from the laws that occasionally led to her incarceration in Winchester Prison for indecency and disorderly conduct.


Despite her vocation, the 35-year-old Atkins, afflicted by a speech impediment and burdened by the tragic loss of her father in a sewer repair accident during her early years, possessed a fiery temperament. Nonetheless, she always took care to arm herself with a strong physique, ready to defend against violent and perverse customers.


Alas, on the fateful day of October 6, 1903, her preparation proved inadequate.


Having just been released from a recent stint in prison, Atkins found herself embroiled in trouble mere hours after her freedom was regained. She suffered a brutal assault, leaving her with grievous facial injuries that necessitated medical attention.


And yet, fate had more cruel intentions in store.


Around 11pm, Atkins stepped into a cab accompanied by three men, two of whom were serving soldiers clad in gray overcoats and donning Glengarry patterned caps—a clear indication of their affiliation with the 2nd Royal Scots Fusiliers stationed at Mandora Barracks in Aldershot. The third man had been discharged from the regiment.


They directed the driver, Robert Carter, to drop them off near the 'Red' church in the vicinity of the Wellington Statue. One of the men ominously confided in the driver his intention to rob Atkins of the £10 she had concealed within her garments.


At approximately 2:30am, a partially unclothed body was discovered in a nearby coppice.


Some doubted it could be Atkins, for had she not perished in prison just the week before? Certain individuals insisted that she possessed the strength to defend herself, while others were convinced otherwise.


Yet, the victim was indeed Atkins.


The scene that awaited those who arrived was horrifying—her head bore the marks of a savage beating inflicted by jagged branches, her body drenched in blood. It was evident that she had fought tenaciously for her life, despite being restrained by her wrists.


Soon, events took an unexpected turn.


A laborer approached a driver from the Royal Engineers, urgently sharing, "Wait a minute, friend. There were two soldiers down at the common who murdered a woman. I heard her cries for help, and when I arrived, they had killed her, stripped her, and then turned their violence towards me. I was subjected to blows upon my head, body, and hands."


Overwhelmed by fear for his own safety and recognizing the futility of intervening, he made a hasty retreat.


Curiously, he appeared unscathed.


The driver advised him to report the incident to the military authorities, who, in turn, contacted the civilian police. Accompanied by Sergeant Garrett, the laborer guided them to the copse where the lifeless body had been discovered.


Significantly, the victim's shoes were missing.


However, doubts emerged concerning his testimony.


The police were acquainted with the man, later revealed to be a former fusilier named Thomas Cowdrey. Having spent time in an asylum and possessing limited intelligence, he failed to inspire confidence during the investigation. Consequently, at the behest of the police, the entire regiment was paraded in the hope that he might identify Atkins's assailants, yet he professed ignorance.


Nonetheless, he remained a person of considerable interest to the detectives.


But the detectives were not toiling in solitude.


Major Woods, conducting his own inquiries, questioned men regarding any suspicious activity or individuals they may have observed. Private John Robertson proved to be the key informant, disclosing that two of his colleagues, William Brown, aged 27, and John Dunbar, aged 21, had been absent without permission that fateful night.


Furthermore, upon their return in the early hours, Brown had requested a towel to clean his bloodstained hands, a fact noticed by Robertson.


When interrogated, neither Brown nor Dunbar denied having absconded from the barracks or having been in Atkins's company at the Crimea Inn. They also implicated Cowdrey as the third man.


A search conducted near Brown's barracks yielded the discovery of Atkins's missing shoes, leading to the arrest of the two men on charges of murder.


Later, the cab driver participated in an identification parade, confidently singling out Cowdrey as the third passenger he had collected from the pub and transported to the vicinity of the church. Further evidence against Cowdrey surfaced through the presence of bloodstains on his attire.


Consequently, both Brown and Cowdrey stood before Mr. Justice Willis at the Hampshire Assizes on November 24. Though the two soldiers exhibited contrasting displays of composure—Brown incessantly gnawing at his lip, while Cowdrey wore a peculiar countenance, alternating between a sneer and a smile—they pleaded "not guilty" when asked for their pleas, each speaking in a resolute and audible voice. Dunbar, however, quivered with trepidation.


Addressing the assembled jurors, Mr. Justice Willis declared it to be the most appalling murder case he had the misfortune of trying, with a staggering count of 60 witnesses to be heard. The gravity of the situation necessitated that the jurors remain together until the conclusion of the trial, lodged at a Winchester hotel, with means for their essential needs to be provided.


The Crown's case was led by Charles Matthews KC, who, in his opening statement, contended that Brown and Dunbar had not embarked on a night of revelry and debauchery in search of another prostitute named Jenny Clark, as the prosecution had initially posited. Failing to locate her, they returned to the Crimea Inn, where they encountered Atkins. The three individuals walked together, with Cowdrey trailing a short distance behind.


At the cab stand, Brown inquired of Carter the cost of a ride to the Wellington Statue. When informed of the fare—two shillings—he acquiesced.


Subsequently, Atkins and Dunbar proceeded toward the small woodland, with Cowdrey again following behind. Meanwhile, Brown engaged in a dispute with the driver over the fare before eventually joining the others.


That marked the final sighting of Atkins alive, Matthews informed the court. "She was forced to the ground, and a fierce and savage struggle ensued. Seven wounds were found upon her head, inflicted by a blunt, heavy object, possibly the buckle of a soldier's belt. Injuries to her face suggest they were caused by a branch from a tree, half of which was discovered near the woman's lifeless form."


Despite the considerable number of witnesses called forth during the trial, the proceedings concluded in a mere four days. Each defendant sought to deflect blame onto the other for Atkins's demise. Brown acknowledged that he and Dunbar had gone to the copse with the intention of engaging in sexual activity but claimed it was he who had attacked Atkins after Cowdrey confirmed she carried money.


Dunbar admitted being present at the scene but maintained that he neither assaulted her nor possessed any knowledge of a plot to rob11 pmher.


In his closing remarks, Mr. M. St. Gerrands contended that the jury faced a straightforward decision. "It is a matter of murder or nothing," he reasoned. "You must decide whether these men, who possess every opportunity to lead fulfilling lives, should be acquitted or face a violent and dishonorable death."


Expressing skepticism toward the prosecution's claims, particularly the notion that they would rob a woman known for her destitution, he remarked, "It is the product of a fevered imagination. No more improbable a tale exists than that a man fresh from committing a heinous murder would immediately proceed to the barracks and say to a comrade, 'I have blood on my hands; lend me a towel.'"


Following a 40-minute deliberation, the jury convicted Brown and Cowdrey, who were promptly sentenced to death, while Dunbar was acquitted.


The circumstances surrounding the discovery of the shoes raised significant concerns that they had been deliberately planted by an unknown party subsequent to Brown's arrest.


Although Dunbar mounted a campaign asserting his compatriot's innocence and placing the blame solely on Cowdrey, Home Secretary Aretas Akers-Douglas refused to intervene. Consequently, on the morning of December 16, at 8 a.m., the two men made their final journey of 30 yards from the condemned cell to the looming gallows.


As the noose was tightened around his neck, Brown confessed, "Before I depart this world, I confess my involvement."


Cowdrey then exclaimed, "Grant me five minutes to speak the truth. God has aided me in my innocence. I am bound for Heaven. Brown is the perpetrator and has confessed."


Hardly had the words "I helped" faded from Brown's lips than they were executed.


And the somber tolling of the prison bell reverberated.

 
 
 


Ed and Lorraine Warren

Ed and Lorraine Warren, renowned seekers of the supernatural, emerged as icons in the realm of paranormal investigations, their names etched in the annals of horror history.


Their relentless pursuit of spectral enigmas led them to venture into the most notorious haunted locations known to mankind. From the harrowing "Amityville Horror" to the spine-chilling Enfield Poltergeist, the Warrens fearlessly trod where others dared not, leaving behind a legacy woven with the threads of otherworldly encounters. It is within this tapestry of terror that we uncover seven of their most prolific expeditions, some of which unfolded amidst the ghost-ridden landscapes of Connecticut, shrouded in the diabolical clutches of the supernatural.


One such haunting that permeated the eerie atmosphere was dubbed "The Devil Made Me Do It." In the hallowed halls of Danbury Superior Court, on that fateful day of March 19, 1981, Ed and Lorraine Warren bore witness to a grand jury indictment against Arne Cheyenne Johnson.


The accused stood accused of slaying Alan Bono, a gruesome act that transpired in the sinister town of Brookfield, Connecticut. Johnson's defense claimed a chilling narrative of demonic possession, a claim that echoed through the chambers of the American court system for the very first time.


The Warrens, delving into the dark recesses of this macabre tale, spent countless hours with Johnson and his kin, ardently advocating the presence of a malevolent force. But alas, the judge, with a heavy heart and a closed mind, dismissed the demonic veil, casting Johnson into the depths of imprisonment, where he languished for five long years.



Ed and Lorrain Warren

Yet, the echoes of terror did not wane; they resounded in the corridors of the mind, and their vibrations led the Warrens to a fabled domain known as Amityville. In the shadowed alcoves of the Masions Hotel on Sacramento Street, San Francisco, Ed and Lorraine Warren embarked on their most celebrated quest. A tale woven in blood and despair, the "Amityville Horror" ensnared the senses of all who dared venture near.


George and Kathy Lutz, the tormented souls who once called this Long Island abode their home, bore witness to a violent phantom entity, a wicked specter that coerced them to flee. But the house, it seemed, whispered secrets long buried within its walls. Preceding the Lutz family's descent into madness,


Ronald DeFeo Jr., driven by an unholy compulsion, slaughtered six of his kin within the same haunted dwelling. The Warrens, attuned to the ethereal currents, probed the malevolent forces and proclaimed the house as a haven for tormented souls. Alas, subsequent investigations shed light upon the insidious hoax that hid behind the facade of terror.


A chilling specter, known as the Snedeker House, beckoned the Warrens to its ghastly embrace. This Southington residence, dripping with the essence of horror, birthed the genesis of a modern nightmare, encapsulated within the spine-tingling tale, "A Haunting in Connecticut." The homeowners, plagued by their son's descent into violent altercations and the apparitions that materialized throughout their dwelling, summoned the Warrens to their aid. Yet, conflicting narratives clouded the truth, for whispers spoke of the son's struggle with schizophrenia, intertwining the tendrils of skepticism with the ever-expanding tapestry of the occult.


Within the confines of their eerie museum in Monroe, the Warrens held captive an object of whispered dread—Annabelle, a Raggedy Ann doll. Its innocent visage concealed a sinister secret, as it allegedly harbored the tormented spirit of a young girl, Annabelle Higgins.


Whispers echoed through the veil of night, tales of the doll's uncanny movements, but it was under

Ed and Lorrain Warren-Anabelle

the watchful gaze of the Warrens that Annabelle found solace within a glass prison. From its eerie confines, Annabelle's presence birthed a franchise of terror, becoming an icon within the expansive realm of "The Conjuring." Amidst the swirling rumors that spoke of its escape, the doll remained securely ensconced within the haunted halls of Monroe, dispelling the notions of freedom, but not the lingering dread.


Within the hallowed walls of the "Conjuring House" in Harrisville, Rhode Island, a malignant force unleashed its wrath upon those who dared set foot within its ancient abode.


The legends whispered of a woman driven to unspeakable depths, sacrificing her own flesh and blood to eternally torment any soul that dared encroach upon her dwelling. In 1974, the Warrens heeded the siren call of this paranormal vortex, encountering levitating beds and the stench of decay that clung to the air like a harbinger of doom.


Their entwined fates with this house of horrors weaved the intricate tapestry of the first "Conjuring" movie, etching their names into the heart of the paranormal realm. Forty-five years later, a new family ventured to claim the house, embracing its spectral embrace, and inviting further explorations into the unknown.


Across the vast expanse of the Atlantic, the Warrens traversed the misty lands of London, stepping into a haunting that would etch its mark upon the annals of supernatural phenomena—the Enfield Poltergeist. Within the confines of a humble abode in Enfield, the furniture came alive, propelled by invisible hands, while disembodied voices echoed through the night, piercing the veil of reality. The two teenage daughters of the afflicted homeowners became the focal point of this malevolent dance, their souls toyed with by forces beyond comprehension.


The Warrens, unyielding in their pursuit, unearthed whispers of demonic possession intertwined with the very fabric of the household. Their journey into this abyss of darkness would form the pulsating core of "The Conjuring 2," forever engraving the Enfield Poltergeist upon the collective nightmares of the world.


Lastly, the Warrens delved into the depths of West Pittston, Pennsylvania, where a small home stood as a testament to the paranormal. In this dwelling, whispered to be a haven of paranormal activity, unlike anything they had previously encountered, a demonic entity cast its nefarious influence.


It flung the family's dog through the air with contemptuous ease and pushed their innocent daughter down a treacherous flight of stairs. The haunting echoes of this malevolence birthed the 1991 made-for-TV movie, "The Haunted," forever linking the Warrens to the chilling tales of West Pittston.


As we weave through the tapestry of the Warrens' harrowing expeditions, it becomes evident that the boundaries between our world and the ethereal realms are tenuous at best. Their legacy, an amalgamation of spine-chilling encounters, persists, invoking a shudder within our souls, reminding us that the supernatural lurks in the shadows, forever beckoning those brave enough to seek its mysteries.

 
 
 

Beneath the seemingly ordinary walls of 284 Green Street, a council house in the heart of Enfield, London, a malevolent force lurked, casting a shadow of terror over the lives of its inhabitants. From 1977 to 1979, the Enfield poltergeist unleashed a horrifying reign of supernatural terror, leaving no one unscathed. Prepare yourself for a descent into the depths of fear as we delve into the bone-chilling tale that unfolded within those haunted walls.



The Nightmarish Enigma: Within the confines of that unassuming residence, the lives of two innocent sisters, Janet (11) and Margaret Hodgson (13), turned into a waking nightmare. Skepticism collided with belief as renowned figures like Maurice Grosse, a brilliant inventor, and Guy Lyon Playfair, a writer immersed in the world of the paranormal, found themselves entangled in a sinister web of supernatural occurrences. While some doubted the authenticity of the haunting, Janet and Margaret's eerie experiences left an indelible mark on the believers' souls. Amidst the chaos, dark secrets festered, blurring the boundaries between truth and deception.


Unleashing the Darkness: The haunting at 284 Green Street refused to remain hidden within its walls. Like a ravenous beast, its tale spread through the British newspapers, captivating readers with its spine-chilling nature. From literary works to gripping television and radio documentaries, the Enfield poltergeist's story echoed through the corridors of fear. And in 2016, the horror reached its pinnacle as "The Conjuring 2," a bone-chilling film based on these terrifying events, took the silver screen by storm. Brace yourself for a journey into the heart of darkness, where nightmares become reality.


Unearthly Claims: In the sweltering heat of August 1977, a cry for help pierced the night. Peggy Hodgson, a single mother, summoned the authorities to her rented home, trembling with fear. The horrors that unfolded within those walls defied all reason. Furniture moved with a will of its own, sinister knocking reverberated through the air, and the innocent lives of Janet and Margaret were thrust into a world of terror. Levitation, disembodied voices, and violent upheavals shattered their existence, plunging them into an abyss of unrelenting horror.


Peering into the Unknown: A team of intrepid investigators dared to confront the malevolent entity that haunted the Enfield residence. Maurice Grosse and Guy Lyon Playfair, members of the Society for Psychical Research, stood on the precipice of fear, confronting the unexplained. Doubt lingered in their minds, casting a shadow over the girls' claims. Yet, amidst the chaos, fragments of truth emerged, hinting at a darkness that defied comprehension.



The renowned demonologists, Ed and Lorraine Warren, added their expertise to the investigation, their conviction unwavering. It became a battle between faith and skepticism, where the line between reality and nightmare blurred.

Unmasking the Shadows: As the investigation delved deeper into the heart of the terror, the webs of deception began to unravel.


Caught on camera, Janet's clandestine acts were exposed, revealing her involvement in bending spoons and manipulating objects. Skeptics like Joe Nickell, armed with the power of reason, tore at the seams of the paranormal claims, unmasking the haunting as a complex web of trickery. The voices from beyond were called into question, and their authenticity shattered. But even amidst the skepticism, the lingering presence of the Enfield poltergeist refused to fade away, leaving behind an eternal enigma that sent shivers down the spines of all who dared to remember.



Conclusion: In the annals of the paranormal, the Enfield poltergeist will forever stand as a testament to the terrifying unknown. Its haunting legacy continues to haunt the minds of skeptics and believers alike, reminding us of the fragility of our perceptions and the eternal struggle between light and darkness. As we confront the blurred boundaries of truth and fear, the Enfield poltergeist remains an enigma, a chilling reminder that nightmares can seep into our reality, forever altering our lives. Brace yourself, for the shadows still whisper their tales of terror, waiting for the unwary to tread into the heart of darkness.


 
 
 
  • Twitter
  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Instagram Social Icon
  • YouTube
Ghost Hunter Tours

©2000 by Ghost Hunter Tours. London. England

 

 "Are You Brave Enough" is a registered trade mark for Ghost Hunter Tours. All content, such as images and written materials, found on this website is the exclusive intellectual property of Ghost Hunter Tours. The written consent of Ghost Hunter Tours is required for any copying, reproduction, or distribution of any part of this website. Unauthorized use of the materials may lead to legal consequences. If you wish to use our materials, kindly contact us to obtain permission. We appreciate your respect for our intellectual property.

Bank Details: Ghost Hunter Tours  SortCode: 04-00-03  Acct Number:  49129011

bottom of page